SLED grants can make IT acquisition possible

Vendors can help navigate the grant process

As many as one-third of government agencies do not apply for grants to help finance their missions, even though that money is available to fund initiatives and bridge the funding gap in existing programs. A vendor that understands how to navigate the grant process can be of great help to a state or local government agency, pointing them in the direction of resources they may have overlooked.

Let’s look at how vendors can play an important part in the SLED grant-seeking process.

Biggest SLED grant hurdles: Complexity and awareness

A considerable percentage of eligible agencies don’t take advantage of grant opportunities. According to GrantStation, among government funding sources, state government application rates (74%) were higher than those of local government (71%) or the federal government (64%) at the end of 2023. That means as many as one-third of all agencies do not apply for grant funding. Meanwhile Instrumentl found that “there are currently more than 900 federal grant programs offered by 26 different grant-making agencies.”

Why aren’t government agencies taking advantage of these opportunities? Main reasons include lack of expertise, the process can be too complicated and lack of understanding of the associated costs to write a compelling grant proposal.

But complexity isn’t the only reason government agencies don’t apply for grants. Often it boils down to a lack of awareness. Agencies that have not historically included grant requests in their funding strategies might not even know of available opportunities.

Qualified vendors can provide opportunity information and assistance to agencies, so that they are better positioned to pursue them.

A trusted vendor can help an agency identify grants and the correct government points of contact who manage those grants. This can save time and provide additional business value.

Vendor-agency cooperation is fundamental to success

Awareness only goes so far. Agencies must have access to a knowledgeable grant writer and clear communication with their trusted vendors.

For some smaller local agencies, an administrative employee may be completing the application. They will have to rely on vendors to help answer technical requirements. On the other hand, grant writers with more experience may meet with vendors during the application process, so that both parties understand the requirements for answering grant application questions. Regardless, vendors and agencies that make a coordinated effort can prepare compelling grant responses.

Some local commissions offer grant resources to third-party writers. The Roanoke Valley-Alleghany Regional Commission is starting the Ready LDD Grant Writing Bench program. This Virginia program will provide on-call grant writers and project management support to its member communities of Alleghany County, Botetourt County, Craig County, the City of Covington and the Town of Clifton Forge.

3 questions to consider before pursuing grant opportunities

To help your agency customers decide if they are ready to start a grant-seeking program, there are a few things they have to address upfront:

  • What is their appetite for grant solicitation? Not every agency will want to direct personnel and financial resources to a grant application process.
  • What is their timeline? Grant-seeking success means coordinating requests with adequate preparation time, including internal planning and forecasting when a grant may be used.
  • Are they willing to have a grants conversation with you? A collaborative agreement with vendors during the grant application process can save time and help create a persuasive response to grant applications.

There are amazing growth opportunities within grants. Consider working with the right vendors to help you navigate the complex process and start building your pipeline of grant opportunities.

This blog was adapted from a commentary originally published in Washington Technology. For the full original commentary, click here.

Chauncey Kehoe is SLED Program Director for immixGroup, the public sector business of Arrow Electronics. immixGroup delivers mission-driven results through innovative technology solutions for public sector IT. Visit www.immixgroup.com for more information.

Do you want to keep on top of federal procurement regulations? Subscribe to immixGroup’s Government Sales Insider blog now!

Quantum computing requires new levels of cybersecurity

Federal sector expects increase in quantum activity during 2024

By Jimmy Baker and Bruce LaPine, PhD

If you’ve read any federal or state IT publications lately, then you should be familiar with the national cybersecurity concerns surrounding quantum computing. But what is the difference between classical and quantum computing, and what’s in store for federal agencies, both near-term and down the road?

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) had a deadline of November 22, 2023, for any feedback on proposed standards that could be strong enough to stand up to the threat that quantum computing poses to public sector security.

NIST is defining security standards for the age of quantum computing, along with some definitions of the language associated with the quantum world.

Technology advances create security vulnerabilities

As quantum.gov indicates, quantum-based technologies are already making seismic shifts in the private sector, and government is not far behind. Examples of quantum computing already making a difference in technology, quantum.gov states, include GPS, magnetic resonance imaging, semiconductors and lasers for telecommunications.

Because Quantum Information Science (QIS) and Quantum Information Processing systems (QIPs) are so profoundly revolutionary, their capabilities can be used by adversaries to cause detrimental effects to business, industries and the government sector.

One of the major technology areas that may be affected with the projected power and speed of quantum computing is today’s encryption. Current algorithms take a massive amount of compute power and time to break an encryption code using a conventional computer.  

Quantum computing systems have the ability to perform simultaneous computations at an exponential rate when compared to the linear processes of today’s conventional computers. What would have taken many years with today’s computers can be performed in as little as hours using quantum-based systems.

Because of this extremely short compute time, quantum computing has the unfortunate effect of extinguishing any possible safety factors. Consequently, most currently encrypted transactions involving information exchange are at risk.

NIST algorithms for quantum-resistant encryption

After much research, NIST selected four algorithms that are likely to withstand quantum computer attacks. The agency is working to standardize these algorithms as a last step to enabling organizations around the world to integrate them into their encryption infrastructure.

The proposed standards include:

  • CRYSTALS-Kyber, for general encryption purposes such as creating secure websites (covered in FIPS 203).
  • CRYSTALS-Dilithium, to protect digital signatures when signing documents remotely (covered FIPS 204).
  • SPHINCS+, another proposed algorithm for digital signatures (covered in FIPS 205).

A draft standard for FALCON, the fourth algorithm, which will also address electronic signatures, will be released in about a year, NIST says.

The proposed standards are distinct guidelines that will impact both the commercial and federal sectors. There’s much activity being planned in quantum computing in the federal sector from now through the end of 2024. By familiarizing yourself with quantum topics and the upcoming initiatives being proposed by NIST, you’ll be in better shape to position your offerings properly in the post-quantum information exchange world.

Contact an immixGroup representative about quantum computing and other trends that should be on your radar.

Jimmy Baker is public sector marketing strategist and Bruce LaPine, PhD is security architect for immixGroup, the public sector business of Arrow Electronics. immixGroup delivers mission-driven results through innovative technology solutions for public sector IT.

Visit http://www.immixGroup.com/ for more information.

Want to keep on top of federal procurement regulations? Subscribe to immixGroup’s Government Sales Insider blog now!

How to keep control of the sale during marketplace transactions

Avoid getting cut out of the deal

By Sydney Herren, Director of Sales, Partners & Alliances

Unpacking the transaction workflow

immixGroup is recognized by Amazon Web Services (AWS) as a designated seller of record (DSOR). As a DSOR, we have rates that are only associated with AWS Marketplace that channel partners can access. immixGroup has an AWS Marketplace dedicated deal desk that assists our channel partners with creating and delivering private offers to their end users. 

Add your terms and services to the offer, if applicable, and then provide the offer to your customer. With an accepted offer, you, your customer, immixGroup, and AWS Marketplace will be notified and the software will be delivered.

Familiarize yourself with Marketplace language

There are a lot of terms to navigate when selling through AWS Marketplace. Here are the ones you need to know:

Channel Partner Private Offer (CPPO): These offers may include discounted rates from the list price of public offers and enable you to customize and configure products.

Public listing: These are offers in which a product is purchased at list price directly through AWS. There is minimal seller involvement, the product is not discounted, and it can’t be changed from the publicly listed configurations.

AWS Enterprise Discount Program (EDP): This private pricing program for enterprises provides a discount for a purchase commitment. Under an EDP, customers are already committed to spending a certain amount within Marketplace, and their budget is “burned down” as products and services are purchased.

Overcome federal procurement obstacles. Sell on your own terms.

As a channel partner, you’re uniquely positioned to provide holistic solutions using the optimal technologies that integrate well and work in harmony. Marketplace offers another way for you to transact deals — and you have the ability to provide custom pricing, licensing terms, and your own additional services. immixGroup provides the resources to bring together the supplier, channel partner, and end customer to provide a seamless transaction flow. This flow overcomes the challenges faced in federal procurement by providing:

• Contract vehicles
• Support for small businesses
• Role-based governance
• Compliant licensing
• Approved product list
• Funding workflow

Control the sale

After all the hours and resources you put in to meet the customer’s needs, it can be incredibly frustrating when your organization can’t take the sale across the finish line. The problem is often when it leaves your hands and goes to the customer’s procurement process.

immixGroup helps you understand how to maintain control throughout every step of the sales cycle, even when it’s out of your hands.

• Align AWS Marketplace features and programs to meet common needs for federal procurement officers.
• Streamline procurement from years to weeks.
• Reduce costs for buyers and sellers across government.
• Ensure transactions meet the scope of government regulations.
• Provide governance controls to ensure continued compliance.

Read more details about immixGroup Marketplace at Marketplaces are here to stay (immixgroup.com). Increase your sales potential by leveraging AWS Marketplace and contact an immixGroup representative to get started.

Sydney Herren is the director of sales, partners and alliances for immixGroup. This public sector business of Arrow Electronics delivers mission-driven results through innovative technology solutions for public sector IT demands.

Visit http://www.immixgroup.com/ for more information.

Want to keep on top of federal opportunities and regulations? Subscribe to immixGroup’s Government Sales Insider blog now!

Time’s run out for TikTok with government contractors

New FAR and state rules clamp down on the social media platform

By Skyler Handl, Corporate Counsel Public Sector

You’ve likely heard the rumblings in the news, at both the federal and state levels, regarding national security concerns and the popular social media application TikTok, owned by ByteDance. On August 6, 2020, President Trump issued Executive Order 13942 banning the use of TikTok in the United States. TikTok received a preliminary injunction that prohibited the enforcement of the executive order, and President Biden rescinded the executive order in 2021. In early 2023, Congress acted to renew the effort to restrict TikTok. Their action included a prohibition on TikTok in the Consolidated Appropriations Act 2023 which directed the Office of Management and Budget (“OMB”) to further implement the ban. OMB released guidance (M-23-13) on February 27, 2023, extending the prohibition to federal contractors.

On June 2, 2023, the FAR council published FAR Case 2023-010 ( Prohibition on a ByteDance Covered Application). This interim rule amends FAR part 4, adding a new subpart 4.22, Prohibition on a ByteDance Covered Application, with a corresponding new contract clause at 52.204–27, Prohibition on a ByteDance Covered Application. The FAR clause at 52.204–27 prohibits contractors from having or using a covered application, including TikTok or any successor application of TikTok, on any information technology owned or managed by the federal government or on any information technology (IT) used or provided by the contractor under a contract, including equipment provided by the contractor’s employees.

Read more of this post

Debt ceiling deal impacts IT budgets

What federal IT contractors need to know about the legislation

By Grier Eagan, Senior Market Intelligence Analyst

With the expected passing of the debt ceiling legislation, which locks in federal civilian spending until January 2025, contractors who sell IT to the government face a shifting landscape. While the Federal Civilian FY24 IT budget will cap at $56.4 billion, identical to the budget passed in FY22, opportunities still exist for those nimble enough to adapt.

Despite this cap representing a $6.9 billion decrease from the IT budget originally requested for FY24, IT vendors should take solace in the fact that the FY25 budget will see a marginal 1 percent increase. However, considering the current annual inflation rate of 4.93 percent as per the Consumer Price Index, this means that the federal civilian government will have approximately 4 percent less buying power under the FY25 budget than the FY24 budget.

Read more of this post

Accelerate cloud sales to the SLED market | Uniform Guidance

Using a contract that was procured in accordance with Uniform Guidance, 2-C.F.R. Part 200, allows state and local (SLED) customers to bypass the traditonal request for proposals (RFP) process. The RFP process is often necessary to execute a deal; it is time consuming and labor intensive. The process can often be bypassed. 

immixGroup recently earned a publicly procured, competitively solicited contract award for Equalis Group Cloud Solutions contract with the Cooperative Council of Governments (CCOG). This contract allows IT suppliers and IT resellers to provide, through EC America, cloud products and services to public sector entities across the country through a legal and compliant exemption to the traditional RFP process. This contract was procured and awarded in accordance with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance.

It’s the perfect time to advise customers about the benefits of using this legal and compliant exemption

Read more of this post

Selling cyber now means understanding FITARA

Feds update FITARA metrics to include agency performance in critical cyber needs.

By Tara Franzonello, Program Development Manager

The U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Oversight and Reform (COR) released its 15th  Federal Information Technology Acquisition Reform Act (FITARA) scorecard in December 2022. This latest scorecard introduced a new category for cyber security. 

Agencies’ protests against enacting this key IT legislation have high visibility from agency chief information officers (CIOs) to the General Accounting Office (GAO) to Congress. Technology vendors have an advantage over their competition if they can help agency customers show progress in measured categories. This is now particularly important for FITARA because agency self-assessment for compliance happens every spring.

Why FITARA matters for federal cyber security sales

Read more of this post

FedRAMP and StateRAMP continue to align on cyber security

By Chauncey Kehoe, Contracts Manager, State, Local, and Education

Recent federal legislation is driving states to follow suit to similar cyber regulation.

During the last few years, we have highlighted the importance of StateRAMP as it pertains to infiltrating the SLED market and staying ahead of contract requirements. Now those things will be made easier with StateRAMP’s new Security Snapshot. For those manufacturers who have not yet received StateRAMP Verified status, you can leverage the StateRAMP Security Snapshot for a small fee and understand your product’s maturity level.

Read more of this post

Important Considerations in an M&A

Four Issues to Consider Before Buying

By Skyler Handl, Corporate Counsel, Public Sector

If you are looking to divest your public sector-focused business or complete an acquisition this year, there is one statistic that should provide pause. According to a recent Harvard Business Review article, 70 to 90 percent of all mergers and acquisitions (M&As) fail. Overpayment and underperforming M&A are common results. Here are some key factors that may impact your decision, valuation, and success.

Read more of this post

Win the Chance to Bid

Tips and techniques for successful RFP responses

By Kevin P. Young, Principal Market Intelligence Analyst

How can you improve the odds of your RFP being seriously considered? There are five general rules that will help keep you from making the most common mistakes that disqualify many RFPs.

The last thing a government contractor wants is to have their bid rejected because they did not correctly complete the government’s Request for Proposals (RFPs). However, rejections for incorrect RFP response are actually a common occurrence. With so many companies competing for federal business, RFPs are often rejected for non-conformity and sloppiness.

Read more of this post